On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:24 AM, adam vogt <vogt.adam@gmail.com> wrote:
Finally, do you have an example of something you can do with the
eventGetter that cannot be done with handleEventHook?

One thing I've wanted is the ability to hook into GHC's I/O manager instead of polling X11 directly. Currently, other threads will not run until xmonad receives an X11 event, because it's blocked in the FFI instead of the I/O manager monitoring the X11 socket. This also means you can't sensibly wait on both a socket/pipe and X11 events.

(Doing the above right also implies that either we synthesize X11 events for non-X11 events, or add an additional eventHook for them. The latter is probably easier, since the former either needs to "steal" an event type from X11 or a rather nonsensical patch to the X11 bindings to support a non-X11 event as an "X11" event type.)

--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net