Read back in this thread.  There was no sugestion that someone doesn't exist.  Alfredo asked if the project was maintained after discovering that there were not many recent commits to the darcs repo and patches for bugs which had yet to be merged.  Another user chimed in that they too would like those patches merged into master and that the lack of a maintainer was what was holding things back.  That second user said that they were maintaining their fixed repo on github.  Alfredo kindly volunteered to maintain the project, and suggested bringing the project onto github.  No assumption was ever made by anyone.  Except perhaps Alfredo's assumption that the website needed a re-write as well :P

Tim

---------- Původní zpráva ----------
Od: Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>
Datum: 7. 11. 2012
Předmět: Re: [xmonad] A community-driven effort to make XMonad better and better

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
But what I read out of Brandon’s mails is: It is not a different
infrastructure that xmonad needs most, it is active and enduring
maintenance and development. I’ve often seen people get excited about

It's part that (and how much activity do you think a Haskell-based project gets?  if I applied the Githubbers; Witnesses model to *that* I get a rewrite into PHP!) and part that I detest Github evangelists.

It really is The One True Church behavior.  We don't exist, have no organization, etc. because we had the presumption to not use The Holy Github?  This is the message of Github evangelists, repeatedly, on multiple projects.

NO.

--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix/linux, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure          http://sinenomine.net