You can add me, twifkak. (I've been lurking; can't promise a lot of attention, but I'll try.)

On Aug 22, 2015 11:22 AM, "Brandon Allbery" <allbery.b@gmail.com> wrote:
xmonad and xmonad-contrib repos added; aavogt and byorgey added as maintainers, I presume others will be needed/wanted. (I may go hunting for github ids of people already listed on xmonad.org)

now looking into triaging and migrating issues, which will be interesting because github issues are per repo instead of per org like we were doing with google code.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Brent Yorgey <byorgey@gmail.com> wrote:
I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth.  I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner <dmwit@dmwit.com> wrote:
I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well.
~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt <vogt.adam@gmail.com> wrote:

My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards,
Adam

On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" <allbery.b@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner <dmwit@dmwit.com> wrote:
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________
xmonad mailing list
xmonad@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad


_______________________________________________
xmonad mailing list
xmonad@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad


_______________________________________________
xmonad mailing list
xmonad@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________
xmonad mailing list
xmonad@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad




--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net



--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________
xmonad mailing list
xmonad@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad