
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:52, Gour D.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:50:46 +0100
> "Magnus" == Magnus Therning
wrote: Magnus> It wouldn't be possible to mimic it completely since hackage Magnus> allows several categories for a single package. However, the Magnus> packages in AUR all have a single category (even though I'm not Magnus> sure how they get them), maybe we could use that.
Well, we could choose one 'main' category in that case.
Otoh, granularity of categories in Arch/AUR is quite rough...mostly all the haskell packages are 'lib' or 'devel' and that's why I thought about some finer classification.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Would you mind giving an example? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe