
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:42:50 +0100
"Magnus" == Magnus Therning
wrote:
Magnus> I've just downloaded all 1937 packages maintained by Magnus> arch-haskell on AUR, and I'm about to put them all in a git Magnus> repository. Before doing that I thought I'd ask if anyone has Magnus> suggestions on the directory hierarchy in that repo? What do you think about mimic the Hackage hierarchy? Magnus> The only criterion I can think of is that we'd probably would Magnus> want binary and source packages separated in some way. I agree with that. Binaries could go all in one bin directory (there is no binary category in Hackage ;) ) Magnus> Any thought or comments on this. I'm particularly interested in Magnus> comments from people who have experience with working with the Magnus> ABS-related tools. I don't have that, but when I was using Gentoo, its overlays were structured in a similar way. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------