On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:59, Peter Simons
Hi Magnus,
> This is a minor point, but is the new version of archlinux (0.3.5) really > API compatible with the previous version (0.3.4)?
yes, I believe it is. I certainly tried to make all changes in a backwards compatible manner.
> If the answer is 'no', then the newer version ought to be 0.4 (or 0.4.0). > [...] I would also argue that cabal2arch is bumped to 0.8 (or 0.8.0) to > clearly mark that the UI has changed and isn't compatible with the previous > version (0.7.5).
Yes, I think a major version bump is in order simply because there have been plenty of changes to both archlinux and cabal2arch. How about bumping the version number for both packages to 1.0? They appear to be well out of beta state, so it feels like we should have an 1.x release.
Yes, I'd say go for it :-) Remy, as the other main contributor nowadays (besides Peter), do you have any objections? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe