8 Nov
2010
8 Nov
'10
4:50 p.m.
On 08/11/10 19:51, Xyne wrote:
Magnus Therning wrote:
I suggest adding them to a group named "haskell-platform" too.
With or without having a haskell-platform package?
Packages and groups should never have the same name. If you think a package by that name would make more sense then forget I mentioned using a group.
I personally think a (meta-) package is better than a group. I've never really understood groups. That is, I understand perfectly how they work, but I don't understand the reason for having them. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe