I notice that in AUR we have haskell-gtk 0.11.2-1 haskell-cairo 0.11.1-1 haskell-gio 0.11.1-1 haskell-glade 0.11.1-1 haskell-glib 0.11.1-1 haskell-pango 0.11.2-1 gtk2hs-buildtools 0.11.1-1 (which is also in AUR, even though its prefix is like the community packages ...) while in Community we also have gtk2hs-gtk 0.11.0-2 gtk2hs-cairo 0.11.0-2 gtk2hs-glade 0.11.0-1 gtk2hs-glib 0.11.0-1 gtk2hs-pango 0.11.0-2 gtk2hs-buildtools 0.9-1 i686 Community gtk2hs-pango 0.11.0-2 i686 Community gtk2hs-cairo 0.11.0-2 i686 Community gtk2hs-gtk 0.11.0-2 i686 Community gtk2hs-glib 0.11.0-1 i686 Community gtk2hs-buildtools 0.9-1 but these do not seem to depend on a gtk2hs-gio; indeed, there is no such package. Are the haskell- packages better, as their version numbers suggest, or are there good reasons for sticking with the gtk2hs- packages? The haskell- packages are maintained by the "arch-haskell" (Arch Haskell Team); the gtk2hs packages are maintained by Sergej Pupykin. Is he part of the Arch Haskell Team. If so, why do we have both groups of packages? If not, should he be persuaded to let the haskell- packages replace the gtk2hs- packages? Also, why does haskell- packages each list as dependencies gtk2hs-buildtools *3 times*? Greg -- ___ ___ __ _ / _ \ / _ \| | | | Gregory D. Weber, Associate Professor / /_\// / | | | /\ | | Indiana University East / /_\\/ /__| | |/ \| | http://mypage.iu.edu/~gdweber/ \____/\_____/\___/\__/ Tel. (765) 973-8420; FAX (765) 973-8550