Re: [arch-haskell] http-conduit

In data 25.09.2012 08:17:54, Magnus Therning ha scritto:

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ramana Kumar wrote:

...

Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list? What about merging in habs-extra?

There is a combination of reasons for my reluctance to accept new packages into HABS and [haskell], Fabio points out the main one in another reply. This means that merging in habs-extra is a BIG deal and unlikely to happen. I also like to see just how Fabio gets on with it. We had a discussion earlier where I expressed my doubts about the idea of splitting up ArchHaskell into several repos. Fabio pressed on with it, so I'm hoping to at some point be converted and have my doubts dispelled :-)

I think that the way I wrote made me misunderstood: I do believe that it should be only one [habs] repository, but with cblrepo many maintainers could manage a small amount of packages, then simply copy the resulting Arch package in the main repo. Maintainers should compile only their package. A script should ensure that everything is in sync. I wrote a very messy script. I would like to have the time to clean it before show you with an example what I mean. I should find some time before the week-end. Fabio