gdweber:
I notice that in AUR we have
haskell-gtk 0.11.2-1
haskell-cairo 0.11.1-1
haskell-gio 0.11.1-1 haskell-glade 0.11.1-1 haskell-glib 0.11.1-1 haskell-pango 0.11.2-1
gtk2hs-buildtools 0.11.1-1 (which is also in AUR, even though its prefix is like the community packages ...)
while in Community we also have
gtk2hs-gtk 0.11.0-2
gtk2hs-cairo 0.11.0-2 gtk2hs-glade 0.11.0-1 gtk2hs-glib 0.11.0-1 gtk2hs-pango 0.11.0-2 gtk2hs-buildtools 0.9-1
i686 Community gtk2hs-pango 0.11.0-2 i686 Community gtk2hs-cairo 0.11.0-2 i686 Community gtk2hs-gtk 0.11.0-2 i686 Community gtk2hs-glib 0.11.0-1 i686 Community gtk2hs-buildtools 0.9-1
but these do not seem to depend on a gtk2hs-gio; indeed, there is no such package.
Are the haskell- packages better, as their version numbers suggest, or are there good reasons for sticking with the gtk2hs- packages?
Long term I think we should move to "standard" haskell-* package names. Stop treating gtk2hs as special. cabal2arch only knows about haskell-glade etc. -- Don