On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Don Stewart
Hey,
ghc 6.12 ships with haddock -- so 'haddock' should be in the provides list, shouldn't it?
There's a bug raised already: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17875
(And does it also ship alex and happy?)
No, these are the binary tools that are part of ghc (in Arch): % pacman -Ql ghc|grep '\/bin/' ghc /usr/bin/ ghc /usr/bin/ghc ghc /usr/bin/ghc-6.12.1 ghc /usr/bin/ghc-pkg ghc /usr/bin/ghc-pkg-6.12.1 ghc /usr/bin/ghci ghc /usr/bin/ghci-6.12.1 ghc /usr/bin/haddock ghc /usr/bin/hp2ps ghc /usr/bin/hpc ghc /usr/bin/hsc2hs ghc /usr/bin/runghc ghc /usr/bin/runhaskell Haddock is probably the only one that needs to be mentioned in 'Provides'. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe