Re: [arch-haskell] What to do now?

On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:14:51 +0100

...

...

...

...

...

"Magnus" == Magnus Therning wrote:

Magnus> Now that Don has decided to focus his Herculean powers in other Magnus> directions I wonder what people feel should be the plan for the Magnus> future. Interestingly enough...it looks as that I had feeling something would happen and few days ago asked a question about Haskell vs D (dons even had time to answer it - see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3863111/haskell-or-d-for-gui-desktop-appl...) In my case, it would mean that I could be less involved with Haskell for the simple reasons of using and having need for much less packages than before... Magnus> Do we try to fix up Don's tools and scripts so that they are Magnus> more conducive to team work? Let's first see who wants to be part of the 'team' or everything was just one-man-band. Magnus> Do we give up on having all of Hackage in AUR and instead rely Magnus> on tools like bauerbill? This is interesting idea... Magnus> Do we try to do something like what Xyne suggested--set up a Magnus> Haskell ABS and publish pre-compiled packages in [arch-haskell]? ...however, in the spirit of Arch (in comparison with the Gentoo which I left 3yrs ago), I consider that having kind of 'Haskell overlay' with binary packages would be very nice... Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------