Please stay on topic, this is *not* a discussion about Haskell Platform[1], it's a discussion on ArchHaskell[2]. Please read up on the mailing list archives first, and then, if you still feel there's a need to discuss HP in ArchHaskell (which isn't the same thing as Arch itself) then please start a new thread. /M [1]: http://www.haskell.org/platform/ [2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ArchHaskell On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:

...

Now I'm going to run the risk of upsetting you quite a bit by being completely blunt.

Indeed.

...

You come across in your mail like someone who has thought through your own situation, but fail to see the larger picture. You do know *your*

May I ask you a question, then?

Does the Haskell Platform have any reason to exist?

Supposedly, the Haskell community backs the Haskell Platform as the way that most users should be using the Platform. Yet we have here a vendor platform which does not support it, and newcomers who notice this and question it are chastised for not thinking about the needs of other people. This suggests that the Haskell Platform is unimportant and perhaps disruptive to some significant group of people... is this so?

And then, looking at your own message, I must ask: have you considered that the Platform is aimed at the great many people who do not have large amounts of expertise maintaining their own personal Haskell ecosystem. Or are your needs so important that these people must in fact be told to deal?

Or, to phrase in your own words:

...

You come across in your mail like someone who has thought through your own situation, but fail to see the larger picture.

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix/linux, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure http://sinenomine.net

-- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus