Re: [arch-haskell] [arch-general] Haskell Support Was: Xmonad version?

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:51:27AM -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Yes, but they do a lot of testing with those packages in HP project. We don't have man power to do this, we better go with HP I think.
And here we disagree :-) My impression is that there is no *testing* in HP at all, instead they choose the latest stable version of GHC and a set of packages at versions that fit together, sometimes they are the most recent most often they aren't. Some choices are even outright questionable, like OpenGL. IMNSHO haskell platform only makes sense for systems that lack a proper packaging system, where it makes available a convenient installer. As I understand "the Arch way" it means using the *latest* stable release. A good example of this is the move to python3. I think Haskell shouldn't be treated in any other way. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:01:00 +0100, Magnus Therning
As I understand "the Arch way" it means using the *latest* stable release. A good example of this is the move to python3. I think Haskell shouldn't be treated in any other way.
I agree. Haskell packages should always be the latest possible (regarding dependencies) stable version, like all other arch packages. Cabal is there for installing arbitrary specific package versions, something an arch package repo can never provide. The haskell platform is something that just doesn't fit with the arch spirit. If we want to provide the "Batteries included" experience, maybe we could provide a meta package that contains (most of) the things from haskell-platform, but as the latest possible release (as is the arch way)? This is just a suggestion from someone new to this group, but not entirely new to haskell on arch. Best Regards Philip
participants (2)
-
Magnus Therning
-
Philip Müller