any updates on 6.10? - arch-haskell - Haskell.org

newer
Arch Haskell News: Jan 11 2009

any updates on 6.10?

older
AUR updated

brad clawsie

21 Dec 2008 21 Dec '08

1:02 a.m.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 any eta? is there anything list members can do to help to get 6.10 packaged? thanks brad -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklN3A8ACgkQxRg3RkRK91OTqQCcD0/djO2Vj3aYAch5f871mbRu o/EAoJaQ0UBgwBsUXFlOmFDbPFGj615Q =jCEf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Don Stewart

21 Dec 21 Dec

2:28 a.m.

It's in [testing]. We may be able to switch over soon, actually. Most packages are working. clawsie:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

any eta?

is there anything list members can do to help to get 6.10 packaged?

thanks brad -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklN3A8ACgkQxRg3RkRK91OTqQCcD0/djO2Vj3aYAch5f871mbRu o/EAoJaQ0UBgwBsUXFlOmFDbPFGj615Q =jCEf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Vesa Kaihlavirta

22 Dec 22 Dec

1:53 a.m.

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Don Stewart wrote:

It's in [testing].

We may be able to switch over soon, actually. Most packages are working.

xmonad-contrib being perhaps the most serious breaking one. Also, didn't you mention some regressions in 6.10.1? --vk

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Don Stewart

23 Dec 23 Dec

2:25 p.m.

vpkaihla:

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Don Stewart wrote:

...
It's in [testing].

We may be able to switch over soon, actually. Most packages are working.

xmonad-contrib being perhaps the most serious breaking one.

Also, didn't you mention some regressions in 6.10.1?

I think I'm less concerned about that now. Most of our packages are building, and the shootout has switched over to 6.10.x without incident. -- Don

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Vesa Kaihlavirta

25 Dec 25 Dec

3:28 a.m.

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Don Stewart wrote:

...
xmonad-contrib being perhaps the most serious breaking one.

Also, didn't you mention some regressions in 6.10.1?

I think I'm less concerned about that now. Most of our packages are building, and the shootout has switched over to 6.10.x without incident.

Yep, my experience with 6.10 has been completely positive as well. Ok, we'll wait for the next xmonad release and then do the update. The AUR side remains a bit troublesome still, though, but I don't think we can fix that right now. And Merry Christmas to all!

-- Don

-- --vk

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Don Stewart

3:32 a.m.

vpkaihla:

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Don Stewart wrote:

...
...
xmonad-contrib being perhaps the most serious breaking one.

Also, didn't you mention some regressions in 6.10.1?

I think I'm less concerned about that now. Most of our packages are building, and the shootout has switched over to 6.10.x without incident.

Yep, my experience with 6.10 has been completely positive as well.

Ok, we'll wait for the next xmonad release and then do the update. The AUR side remains a bit troublesome still, though, but I don't think we can fix that right now.

And Merry Christmas to all!

I think AUR is in a pretty robust state, but it is now time to move things off AUR and into binary form. -- Don

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

5990

Age (days ago)

5994

Last active (days ago)

Download

5 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

brad clawsie
Don Stewart
Vesa Kaihlavirta