AUR Comment for haskell-abortt-transformers

from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40580 magus wrote: A test comment, I need to work out the settings for arch-haskell. --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

Ah, as you see I've now managed to configure the mailing list so that
messages from AUR come through :-)
/M
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:20,
from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40580 magus wrote:
A test comment, I need to work out the settings for arch-haskell.
--- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button. _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
-- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:27, Rémy Oudompheng
On 2010/10/13 Magnus Therning
wrote: Ah, as you see I've now managed to configure the mailing list so that messages from AUR come through :-)
Get prepared to flooded by comments from angry users ! Btw did you look at my refactoring of cabal2arch ?
I had a very cursory glance at it only so far. I did like what I saw, but I'll have a slightly more details look later, hopefully today. In the future, would you mind being added to the archhaskell organisation on github so you don't have to rely on me for getting your changes in? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

On 13/10/10 11:54, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On 2010/10/13 Magnus Therning
wrote: In the future, would you mind being added to the archhaskell organisation on github so you don't have to rely on me for getting your changes in?
I don't mind.
I've had a closer look, and I've left a comment on the pull request. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

On 13/10/10 10:27, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On 2010/10/13 Magnus Therning
wrote: Ah, as you see I've now managed to configure the mailing list so that messages from AUR come through :-)
Get prepared to flooded by comments from angry users ! Btw did you look at my refactoring of cabal2arch ?
I've changed the email address on the AUR account to a private one again. Not because of the flooding but because using the mailing list address would allow pretty much anyone to reset the password on the AUR account via the "Forgot Password" link. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

Hi Magnus.
I've changed the email address on the AUR account to a private one again. Not because of the flooding but because using the mailing list address would allow pretty much anyone to reset the password on the AUR account via the "Forgot Password" link.
Good catch. :-) I wonder whether there is anything we can do to remedy that problem? I reckon the mailing software has some kind of regex-based filtering mechanism? Would it be possible to let all e-mails pass that match a fairly strict "this is a comment" expression? All other e-mails that don't match this regex would go to the moderator. That should catch the "Forgot Password" emails reliably, but everything else would go through without delay. In any case, what happens to e-mails that the list won't accept? Are they in some kind of moderator queue? Take care, Peter

On 14/10/10 20:52, Peter Simons wrote:
Hi Magnus.
I've changed the email address on the AUR account to a private one again. Not because of the flooding but because using the mailing list address would allow pretty much anyone to reset the password on the AUR account via the "Forgot Password" link.
Good catch. :-)
I wonder whether there is anything we can do to remedy that problem? I reckon the mailing software has some kind of regex-based filtering mechanism? Would it be possible to let all e-mails pass that match a fairly strict "this is a comment" expression? All other e-mails that don't match this regex would go to the moderator. That should catch the "Forgot Password" emails reliably, but everything else would go through without delay.
That could be possible, but I'd need to do a bit of testing to make sure that works :-)
In any case, what happens to e-mails that the list won't accept? Are they in some kind of moderator queue?
Yes, currently they are caught in a moderator queue. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

Hi Magnus,
That could be possible, but I'd need to do a bit of testing to make sure that works :-)
well, if I can help in any way, please just let me know. It should be possible to configure a procmail-based forwarder, too, fairly easily.
In any case, what happens to e-mails that the list won't accept? Are they in some kind of moderator queue?
Yes, currently they are caught in a moderator queue.
Could you please approve those postings so that we get them on the list? Take care, Peter
participants (4)
-
aur-notify@archlinux.org
-
Magnus Therning
-
Peter Simons
-
Rémy Oudompheng