ghc-7.0.3 & haskell-platform

Hello to all Haskellites, There's finally an upgraded haskell-platform and corresponding packages in extra/ -- reason for the delay was partly lack of brainpower (I had some time, but didn't have the energy to work with thought). When my summer vacation just started, I got enough quality time with the problem and managed to untangle the mess in minutes, really. What happened recently: - reversed FS#17875, which was alone causing all the trouble :( - ghc-7.0.3-2, haskell-platform-2011.2.0.0-4 went into testing repo - started moving everything else away from extra to community (-testing at first) * this is not many packages, I think it's just darcs, haddock and their dependencies - xmonad, xmonad-contrib and their deps built and uploaded to community-testing ghc-7.0.4 just came out, which fixes some nasty bugs, but sadly, the platform is not there yet. Rémy was doing some work on automating the whole rebuild process (which is currently about 20-30 separate build & install steps when doing manually), but I don't know how that went. --vk (vegai)

Brilliant, I know there are a few of us who have been waiting for this. /M On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:15:43PM +0300, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote:
Hello to all Haskellites,
There's finally an upgraded haskell-platform and corresponding packages in extra/ -- reason for the delay was partly lack of brainpower (I had some time, but didn't have the energy to work with thought). When my summer vacation just started, I got enough quality time with the problem and managed to untangle the mess in minutes, really.
What happened recently:
- reversed FS#17875, which was alone causing all the trouble :( - ghc-7.0.3-2, haskell-platform-2011.2.0.0-4 went into testing repo - started moving everything else away from extra to community (-testing at first) * this is not many packages, I think it's just darcs, haddock and their dependencies - xmonad, xmonad-contrib and their deps built and uploaded to community-testing
ghc-7.0.4 just came out, which fixes some nasty bugs, but sadly, the platform is not there yet.
Rémy was doing some work on automating the whole rebuild process (which is currently about 20-30 separate build & install steps when doing manually), but I don't know how that went.
--vk (vegai)
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
-- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Perl is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then being a real problem in the longer term. -- Alan Kay

On 2011/6/23 Vesa Kaihlavirta
Rémy was doing some work on automating the whole rebuild process (which is currently about 20-30 separate build & install steps when doing manually), but I don't know how that went.
Actually I did not find the time to do that. I was planning to use a simplified version of the arch-haskell scripts. I can really do the rebuilds by hand in the meanwhile, there are not so many GHC releases and I have enough patience to help. Rémy.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
On 2011/6/23 Vesa Kaihlavirta
wrote: Rémy was doing some work on automating the whole rebuild process (which is currently about 20-30 separate build & install steps when doing manually), but I don't know how that went.
Actually I did not find the time to do that. I was planning to use a simplified version of the arch-haskell scripts. I can really do the rebuilds by hand in the meanwhile, there are not so many GHC releases and I have enough patience to help.
Yeah, I know. It's doable but it also is completely mechanical work and I've found that humans do mistakes easier when the work is mechanical. Plus it's super boring :) I'll investigate my own scripting solution for this. Let's see whose is better and use that :) --vk -- --vk

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:36:39PM +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On 2011/6/23 Vesa Kaihlavirta
wrote: Rémy was doing some work on automating the whole rebuild process (which is currently about 20-30 separate build & install steps when doing manually), but I don't know how that went.
Actually I did not find the time to do that. I was planning to use a simplified version of the arch-haskell scripts. I can really do the rebuilds by hand in the meanwhile, there are not so many GHC releases and I have enough patience to help.
I've attached a script I use for [h4a]. Maybe you'll find it useful. It doesn't try to work out dependencies, but instead you need to provide a good build order. It sounds like that shouldn't be too much of a problem for a rather static set of 20 or so packages though. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:15:43PM +0300, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote:
Hello to all Haskellites,
There's finally an upgraded haskell-platform and corresponding packages in extra/ -- reason for the delay was partly lack of brainpower (I had some time, but didn't have the energy to work with thought). When my summer vacation just started, I got enough quality time with the problem and managed to untangle the mess in minutes, really.
What happened recently:
- reversed FS#17875, which was alone causing all the trouble :( - ghc-7.0.3-2, haskell-platform-2011.2.0.0-4 went into testing repo - started moving everything else away from extra to community (-testing at first) * this is not many packages, I think it's just darcs, haddock and their dependencies - xmonad, xmonad-contrib and their deps built and uploaded to community-testing
ghc-7.0.4 just came out, which fixes some nasty bugs, but sadly, the platform is not there yet.
Rémy was doing some work on automating the whole rebuild process (which is currently about 20-30 separate build & install steps when doing manually), but I don't know how that went.
I noticed that a rebuild of haskell-hslogger is lingering in [testing], does it need any more work or can it be pushed into [extra]/[community]? /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay
participants (3)
-
Magnus Therning
-
Rémy Oudompheng
-
Vesa Kaihlavirta