GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc

Hi All, Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo. I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc? What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these? kind regards, Dawid Loubser

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:23:16PM +0200, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo.
I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc?
What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these?
kind regards, Dawid Loubser
The following link suggests that pandoc from git is working: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/J5lKA8LLUSI

Thanks - I built from git, and it compiles, but I haven't been able to get it running yet (missing latex templates, etc). I'm investigating... regards, Dawid On 07/04/2015 19:40, Skottish wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:23:16PM +0200, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo.
I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc?
What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these?
kind regards, Dawid Loubser
The following link suggests that pandoc from git is working:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/J5lKA8LLUSI _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

Well, I have pandoc working again, having manually checked out and installed pandoc-templates. With it working, I imagine it's only a matter of time before an arch-haskell release :-) kind regards, Dawid On 07/04/2015 20:13, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Thanks - I built from git, and it compiles, but I haven't been able to get it running yet (missing latex templates, etc). I'm investigating...
regards, Dawid
On 07/04/2015 19:40, Skottish wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:23:16PM +0200, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo.
I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc?
What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these?
kind regards, Dawid Loubser The following link suggests that pandoc from git is working:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/J5lKA8LLUSI _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

On 7 April 2015 at 22:34, Dawid Loubser
Well, I have pandoc working again, having manually checked out and installed pandoc-templates. With it working, I imagine it's only a matter of time before an arch-haskell release :-)
Yeah, my goal is to re-introduce it in ArchHaskell as soon as possible after an upstream release that's buildable with 7.10.1. You are all more than welcome to help me keeping an eye on their releases. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:23:16PM +0200, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo.
I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc?
What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these?
Pandoc is now back in the repo. Unfortunately pandoc-citeproc still doesn't build with 7.10 though. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark; professionals built the Titanic. -- Anonymous

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:04:49AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:23:16PM +0200, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo.
I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc?
What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these?
Pandoc is now back in the repo. Unfortunately pandoc-citeproc still doesn't build with 7.10 though.
Now pandoc-citeproc's in the repo too. While at it I also closed #182 by adding pandoc-crossref. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Goto labels should be left-aligned in all caps and should include the programmer's name, home phone number, and credit card number. -- Abdul Nizar

Magnus, you're a rock star! On 17/04/2015 17:55, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:04:49AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:23:16PM +0200, Dawid Loubser wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to GHC 7.10, I am unable to build (e.g. via a straight "cabal install") pandoc, and I note it's current absence from the arch-haskell repo.
I depend on pandoc in a major way, and I was wondering if anybody got it to work? I have myself fixed and submitted pull requests for some minor libraries that my own code uses (mime, iCalendar, etc) but I figure that somebody is surely working on something as prominent as pandoc?
What's the lie of the land? Should I jump in and try my best? (I fear many days of pain might be involved, pandoc has deep dependencies...). I am not a Haskell expert yet. Is somebody working on these? Pandoc is now back in the repo. Unfortunately pandoc-citeproc still doesn't build with 7.10 though. Now pandoc-citeproc's in the repo too. While at it I also closed #182 by adding pandoc-crossref.
/M
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

On 30 April 2015 at 01:01, Xyne
On 2015-04-17 18:07 +0200 Dawid Loubser wrote:
Magnus, you're a rock star!
A little late to the party but +1 on this. Magnus, your work is great! Thank you!
Thank you, thank you very much! ;) /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
participants (4)
-
Dawid Loubser
-
Magnus Therning
-
Skottish
-
Xyne