i think , garbage collector reclaim the ‘f' just only when "foo" can't access .because i think the 'f' is shared between “foo” with "foobar"( "foo" ++ "bar" ).
Zhen Jiang
jiangzhen3s(a)gmail.com
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Zhi-Qiang Lei";
Date: 2011年9月8日(星期四) 中午1:56
To: "Haskell Beginer";
Subject: [Haskell-beginners] Question about lazy evaluation
Hi,
I am confused about this piece of explanation in Real World Haskell.
-- file: ch08/append.hs (++) :: [a] -> [a] -> [a] (x:xs) ++ ys = x : (xs ++ ys) [] ++ ys = ys
In a strict language, if we evaluate "foo" ++ "bar", the entire list is constructed, then returned. Non-strict evaluation defers much of the work until it is needed.
If we demand an element of the expression "foo" ++ "bar", the first pattern of the function's definition matches, and we return the expression x : (xs ++ ys). Because the (:) constructor is non-strict, the evaluation of xs ++ ys can be deferred: we generate more elements of the result at whatever rate they are demanded. When we generate more of the result, we will no longer be using x, so the garbage collector can reclaim it. Since we generate elements of the result on demand, and do not hold onto parts that we are done with, the compiler can evaluate our code in constant space.
When ('f' : "oo") ++ "bar" becomes 'f' : ("oo" ++ "bar") and then becomes 'f' : ('o' : ("o" ++ "bar")), we still need 'f', don't we?
Best regards,
Zhi-Qiang Lei
zhiqiang.lei(a)gmail.com
