[Haskell-beginners] Haskell described as a "rigid" language

Haskell is considered by many as an inflexible language [1] . I describe a flexible language as one that supports any design you want (even a bad one) - if you can think it, you can code it and run it (bugs and all). I share this opinion about Haskell but pursue it because I feel that one day it will open up and let me think more about the problem and less about how to get GHC to approve it. So I guess the question to you practitioners is: Would you agree that it is a rigid language as describe in the link below, or is that just an illusion that goes away with experience? -deech [1] http://therighttool.hammerprinciple.com/statements/this-language-has-a-very-...