On 19 May 2011 22:12, Costello, Roger L.
Is there a web site that defines "pure" versus "impure" code?
Lots of pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency_(computer_science) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence#In_computing
- Pure code is code that does no I/O
- Impure code is code that does I/O
Is that correct?
That's roughly right for a sufficiently greedy definition of "IO".
Also, it is my understanding that good software design is to isolate/separate the impure code from the pure code. Is that correct?
That's the idea. Whether it's correct is up for debate, but that's what Haskellers believe. Pure code is inherently easier to compose, reason about and change. It makes sense to make most of your program pure, especially important logic. Here's an example: This is an IRC (chat) server. This module is impure: https://github.com/chrisdone/hulk/blob/master/src/Hulk/Server.hs This module is pure: https://github.com/chrisdone/hulk/blob/master/src/Hulk/Client.hs Think Pinky and the Brain. Pure code is the brain. Impure code is pinky.
Does that principle apply to all programming languages, or just Haskell?
Haskellers apply this principle wherever they can.