Thanks for the link. :-) Dimitri Em 05/06/14 11:15, Brent Yorgey escreveu:
I didn't say you need a better editor! I said you need better *support* from your editor for writing literate Haskell code. I don't know much about Sublime Text but you might find this useful:
https://bitbucket.org/wrossmck/literate-haskell-bird-style
Anyway, I agree Markdown is better for annotating your code, unless you are writing a paper about it.
-Brent
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:44:05AM -0600, Dimitri DeFigueiredo wrote:
I'm using Sublime Text. I do like it a lot! I disagree that what I need is a better editor. What is the more popular to annotate code today: Github Markdown or Latex? The source file of a latex document is not amenable to be read as you are coding, but Markdown is. So, it helps make the code cleaner. ;-)
Dimitri
Em 05/06/14 10:30, Brent Yorgey escreveu:
Thanks. I wanted to use the fenced version like so.
```haskell myFunction :: Int -> String -- some code goes here ``` OK. Unfortunately it is not possible to get GHC to recognize code in
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:53:05AM -0600, Dimitri DeFigueiredo wrote: that format without some preprocessing.
I find that typing with the Bird style, I get lots of '>' left behind at the end of lines causing syntax problems before I compile. It also makes it harder for me to reformat the code. For example, 'unindent block' no longer works on my editor. Sounds like the real issue is that you need better editor support. What editor are you using? I am just curious, I am not going to suggest that you change editors. =)
-Brent
Em 04/06/14 19:45, Brent Yorgey escreveu:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:58:27PM -0600, Dimitri DeFigueiredo wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a way to use literate haskell with GHC using Markdown but *not* using the Bird style for the code? It seems either one uses Bird style or has to put latex style \begin{code} markup (which markdown doesn't hide) Those are the only two styles which GHC accepts.
In other words, is there a way to mark up the code in Markdown in a way that GHC understands without having to preprocess the file? I just wanted to write a .lhs file in markdown like I write a .hs file today. If you are willing/able to use pandoc, it implements a special version of Markdown for .lhs files which understands Bird tracks. See
http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/README.html#pandocs-markdown
-Brent _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners