The term you're looking for is "parameterized," not "abstract." An abstract data type is something else.
Can't help with your original question though, sorry!
tom
El Sep 14, 2015, a las 14:23, Ryan Warner
I had defined a data type similar to the following:
data Record = Record { name :: String, age :: Int }
Later, I realized I needed it be an ADT defined like: data Record a = Record { name :: String, age :: Int, resource :: a }
The change turned out to be fairly well contained and probably only took me a half hour to propagate up. However, I see the potential for this to be a bigger job. Are there any editors that automate that kind of refactoring?
-Ryan _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners