
... strict typing is getting in the way....
When Haskell's strict typing seems to get in your way, chances are more
that you are heading for a big and nasty problem (aka, bug) sometime down
the line, unless you are extremely careful of what you do.
Strict typing is a boon to software designers in that it helps point out
even major design flaws and that too rather earlier.
But, apart from this, if one is trying to deal with a computational problem
involving lots and lot of state-change (and things like memoization etc),
then there is no "easy" way out for a beginner in Haskell. IMHO, that's
because, Haskell isn't modelled after the so called state-change model of
computation.
But I am sure, Haskell Gurus out there may help you out if you give more
inputs about your problem.
-Damodar
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:45 PM, KC
If one programming language suited every computable problem there would only be one programming language.
You don't seem to have a point worth making without more description of your problem.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dennis Raddle
wrote: Sadly, I've decided Haskell is not the right language for my current project. Python is better. I need to hack together data, and strict typing is getting in the way. Most of my algorithms are better served with imperative/mutable-data. I learned a lot about Haskell trying to do it, but my knowledge of the language is not quiet good enough and I feel like I'm fighting the language. Python is better. For now.
_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
-- -- Regards, KC
_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners