
14 Dec
2015
14 Dec
'15
1:17 p.m.
On 14/12/2015, Raja
So extending this interpretation - can I swap the two parameters (?)
Now my new hypothetical interpretation becomes:
(>>=) :: (a -> m b) -> m a -> m b
Sure, bind' :: Monad m => (a -> m b) -> m a -> m b bind' = flip (>>=)
If i further add parens:
(>>=) :: (a -> m b) -> (m a -> m b)
Yeah, that's exactly the same thing. Types are right associative.