Hello, My current setup for haskell. Arch Linux nix package manager - only for haskell stuff nix-shell vim syntastic + ghc-mod guard - `cabal run` on change of '*.hs' I would like to improve readability of ghc-mod's output. Compare to output of runhaskell, It's quite hard to understand. ~~~ % ghc-mod check LogAnalysis.hs LogAnalysis.hs:90:25:Couldn't match expected type ‘[ghc-prim:GHC.Types.Char]’ with actual type ‘Log.LogMessage -> [ghc-prim:GHC.Types.Char]’In the second argument of ‘(ghc-prim:GHC.Classes.==)’, namely ‘upcase GHC.Base.. LogAnalysis.getMsg’In the expression: str' ghc-prim:GHC.Classes.== upcase GHC.Base.. LogAnalysis.getMsgIn the expression: str' ghc-prim:GHC.Classes.== upcase GHC.Base.. LogAnalysis.getMsg GHC.Base.$ x LogAnalysis.hs:90:17:Couldn't match expected type ‘s -> t’ with actual type ‘ghc-prim:GHC.Types.Bool’Relevant bindings include x :: s (bound at LogAnalysis.hs:90:13) p :: s -> t (bound at LogAnalysis.hs:90:11)The first argument of ($) takes one argument,but its type ‘ghc-prim:GHC.Types.Bool’ has noneIn the expression: str' ghc-prim:GHC.Classes.== upcase GHC.Base.. LogAnalysis.getMsg GHC.Base.$ xIn an equation for ‘p’: p x = str' ghc-prim:GHC.Classes.== upcase GHC.Base.. LogAnalysis.getMsg GHC.Base.$ x % runhaskell LogAnalysis.hs LogAnalysis.hs:90:17: Couldn't match expected type ‘s -> t’ with actual type ‘Bool’ Relevant bindings include x :: s (bound at LogAnalysis.hs:90:13) p :: s -> t (bound at LogAnalysis.hs:90:11) The first argument of ($) takes one argument, but its type ‘Bool’ has none In the expression: str' == upcase . getMsg $ x In an equation for ‘p’: p x = str' == upcase . getMsg $ x LogAnalysis.hs:90:25: Couldn't match expected type ‘[Char]’ with actual type ‘LogMessage -> [Char]’ In the second argument of ‘(==)’, namely ‘upcase . getMsg’ In the expression: str' == upcase . getMsg In the expression: str' == upcase . getMsg $ x ~~~ How I can do either - change ghc-mod's output like runhaskell or - use runhaskell for vim syntastic Thanks.