29 Apr
2012
29 Apr
'12
5:23 p.m.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:32:48 -0400
Michael Orlitzky
On 04/29/2012 02:35 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: We were never talking about easy, only possible.
You may not have ever been talking about easy, but that's pretty much
all I've been talking about. In fact, that's my point: functions not
being first-class objects in ruby makes functional programming in it
harder. This makes it a poor choice if haskell (or any other language
where functional programming is de rigueur) is the goal.