There is nothing wrong with using real functions from a library, but you
never said what library it was or even enough info to guess. Was it
diagrams? Gloss? FOV? Or something you wrote?
If the library doesn't matter, as it didn't in this case, you can just
specify the types like so
data Color = Color
translate :: Int -> Int -> ()
translate = undefined
color :: Color -> ()
color = undefined
red :: Color
red = undefined
so that at least your snippet compiles for others.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:37 PM, John M. Dlugosz
On 4/22/2014 8:58 AM, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:00 PM, John M. Dlugosz < ngnr63q02@sneakemail.com mailto:ngnr63q02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
chain1 = [ translate x y $ color red $ Circle r | (x,y,r) <- pappus 100 [1..10] ]
What is translate? What is color? What is Circle? What is pappus?
None of this is plain haskell.
John, if you make your readers guess at undefined names, they'll go away and hangout somewhere friendlier!
-- Kim-Ee
Sorry — I thought showing a form that did work would be enough. The important part is that I have a input = map foo [0..10] and a bar (t1,t2,t3) = baz where baz returns a tuple, and the result of bar is the guts of another map.
I didn't realize that using real words from a library instead of foo and bar was considered unfriendly!
_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners