Re: [Haskell-beginners] Converting a data type to an abstract data type

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:

you could leave out signatures and let the compiler infer them for you. That way, there's so much you no longer need to refactor.

Thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't recognized that yet. Are type signatures used sparingly in most Haskell code? Or as you say, is it coming to formalize the signatures once the exploration is complete? -Ryan