18 Oct
2011
18 Oct
'11
9:30 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:22:05AM -0700, Alia wrote:
Sorry, as soon as I sent my email below, I realized that c should remain arbitrary because we don't yet know whatwe want (if the function is to be truly pluggable) so you were probably right in your
initial signature (I think).
Exactly right.
But then unless we apply some function that recurses into the tree and generates [c] ...
You are on the right track here although you seem not to realize it. =) Look at your implementations of treeSum, depth, etc. for inspiration... -Brent