
В Thu, 25 May 2017 11:52:01 -0400
David McBride
ListT is a bit weird in that it affects whatever monad is underneath it, so the order of your types in your Transformer stack matters. Both ways have different meanings and each have legitimate uses. In any case you must use the lift function to get to the monad below the one you are at.
import Control.Monad.List import Control.Monad.Writer
test :: IO () test = do (runListT $ runWriterT proc1) >>= print (runWriterT $ runListT proc2) >>= print return ()
proc1 :: Monad m => WriterT String (ListT m) Int proc1 = do tell ("started: " :: String) x <- lift $ ListT (return [1,2]) y <- lift $ ListT (return [3,4,5]) lift $ guard (y /= 5) tell ("x:" ++ show x) tell ("y:" ++ show y) return (x * y)
proc2 :: Monad m => ListT (WriterT String m) Int proc2 = do lift $ tell ("started: " :: String) x <- ListT (return [1,2]) y <- ListT (return [3,4,5]) guard (y /= 5) lift $ tell (" x:" ++ show x) lift $ tell (" y:" ++ show y)
return (x * y)
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Baa
wrote: Hello, everybody!
I can process list in monad style with "do" syntax and to use "guard" function in the body. Something like:
fn :: [a] -> [a] fn lst = do el <- lst guard $ condition el ... return $ change el
How can I do the same but with possibility to call "tell" of "Write" monad in the fn's body? As I understand it should be:
ListT (Writer w) Int
for this example?
- but how to write it? - how to call (run) it? - and how is it safe ("transformers" package has bug in ListT, so "mtl" must be used?)? - is there other canonical way to do it without to use fold*, recursive calls/fix, State/RWS ?
/Cheers _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners
Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners