
David, your experience and intuition were absolutely right: solution is in the right Show and Read pair. So, this seems to work in all cases: import qualified Text.ParserCombinators.ReadP as P import Text.ParserCombinators.ReadPrec (lift) import qualified Data.Char as C -- |Type of Git hashes newtype GitHash = GitHash { ghValue :: T.Text } deriving (Eq, Ord, Generic) instance Show GitHash where showsPrec p a = showParen (p > 10) (showString $ T.unpack $ ghValue a) hexDigits :: P.ReadP String hexDigits = P.munch1 C.isHexDigit instance Read GitHash where readPrec = parens $ do lift P.skipSpaces s::String <- lift hexDigits return $ GitHash $ T.pack s Thanks a lot again!!
My own toy example works. I don't know how yours differs.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Baa
wrote: Hello, David!
`Show` instance is simple:
instance Show Hex where show = T.unpack . ghValue
so
show (Hex "1234ab") 1234ab read "1234ab"::Hex 1234ab read "Just 1234ab"::Maybe Hex -- fails like wrapped in the record!!
Yes, I'm ignoring precedence usually too. And I return rest of the string. Playing with `UTCTime`'s readsPrec shows me that behaviour looks the same: UTCTime's reader returns the same rest. So, may be trick is in the:
1. Precedence ?! 2. readListPrec = readListPrecDefault readList = readListDefault ?
But I get error: readListPrec is not visible method of class Read... 3. readPrec ? I implemented readsPrec which is old-style, but am I right that old-style and new-style are absolutely the same from reading point of view and old-style can replace new-style and vice versa?
PS. I don't import any special modules.
The most common way is to just auto derive Read. I'm not sure that that ever really fails. Are you sure the problem isn't with the Show instance of the type? People commonly write invalid Show instances to make them look pretty and they shouldn't. read and show are supposed to be inverses of each other because when they aren't, problems like this occur.
The simple way to do a Read instance is to implement the reads function for it. The confusion comes from its type. readsPrec :: Int -> ReadS a. ReadS is defined as String -> [(a, String)], where a is the parsed result and String is the rest of the string that is being parsed, , which may look confusing, and the Int is precedence, which can usually be ignored. It could have been Int -> String -> Maybe (a, String), but Read predates Maybe. So instead it returns a list and if it fails to parse, it returns [] instead of Nothing. So.
data MyFoo = MyFoo
instance Read MyFoo where -- readsPrec :: Int -> String -> [(MyFoo, String)] readsPrec _ = readFoo
readFoo :: String -> [(MyFoo, String)] readFoo str = case splitAt 5 str of ("MyFoo", rest) -> [(MyFoo, rest)] otherwise -> []
If you need something more complex, there are functions to do it in base that perform lexing and parsing. I have never used them but you can go ahead and read some of the instances such as Ordering at https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.10.0.0/docs/ src/GHC.Read.html#line-398 to try and learn how it might work for you.
But honestly I think you should look at fixing your Show instance first, if possible.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Baa
wrote: Hello all!
I found some errors in the reading of previously shown big and complex record. Reason is: some of fields are reading wrongly. So, is there any useful documents how to write `Read` instance correctly (because I can't find good tutorial in the Web and often hit errors with `Read` instance)? May be tutorial/examples/any good info...
=== Best regards, Paul _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners
_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners