
7 Jun
2012
7 Jun
'12
7:30 a.m.
Hmm. I've tested over 6,432 to work, but I'm not sure this has any point any more … ;-) On Thursday, 7 June 2012 at 7:17 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Arlen Cuss wrote:
And as Brent pointed out also, it is. :) By the way, so is (,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)! I suspect GHC allows any number. The
Maybe not any number; more than 127 elements in a tuple used to cause core dumps....
-- brandon s allbery allbery.b@gmail.com (mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com) wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms