[Haskell-beginners] Re: Motivation to Learn Haskell

Tim Perry writes:

If you do jump in, I'd recommend the Real World Haskell book or the The Haskell School of Expression book.

Another interesting title is _Programming in Haskell,_ by Graham Hutton (see http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~gmh/book.html). Duncan Coutts has written a review on the title (see http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~gmh/book-review.pdf). As for motivation for learning Haskell, one motivator is the purely functional nature of the language, which is referentially transparent and therefore facilitates reasoning about programs. Haskell has roots in category theory, and therefore, it is frequently possible to use category-theoretical reasoning to reason about the correctness of programs; this cannot be said of most other programming languages. -- Benjamin L. Russell

Good luck, Tim

----- Original Message ---- From: Lorenzo Isella To: beginners@haskell.org Sent: Fri, September 3, 2010 3:57:26 PM Subject: [Haskell-beginners] Motivation to Learn Haskell

...

From time to time, I try to find the motivation to learn at least the fundamentals of another programming language. I normally use R and Python on a daily basis (but I am not that much into OO

Dear All, It is my first post to this list and please do not take it as an attempt to start any flamewar. programming) and have a good knowledge of Fortran and a rather superficial one of C. Beside learning a new language as a sort of mind expanding exercise, I try to figure out how and if it can save me some time in my work and how it measures up against other languages. These days I tend to rely on R for data analysis and visualization whereas I use Python (in particular Numpy+SciPy) for number crunching (it is very convenient to use scipy/numpy to solve ODE's, manipulate arrays and so on). Now, I wonder what benefit I would gain from learning Haskell since I mainly write codes for numerical simulations/data analysis. I know Haskell is gaining momentum e.g. in the financial environment (I happened to see Haskell knowledge as a specification in some quant jobs) hence it must be more than suitable for numerical work and, by the little I have understood so far, it allows one to write code really resembling mathematical expressions (I was impressed by guards and curried functions). However, it also looks to me (correct me if I am mistaken) that Haskell is a far cry from the wealth of standard and contributed scientific modules you have in Python or R and thanks to which you do not re-implement the wheel yourself. Any thoughts/suggestions are really appreciated. Cheers

Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

-- Benjamin L. Russell / DekuDekuplex at Yahoo dot com http://dekudekuplex.wordpress.com/ Translator/Interpreter / Mobile: +011 81 80-3603-6725 "Furuike ya, kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto." -- Matsuo Basho^