Re: [Haskell-beginners] pure instead of return?

btw: does the name of "pure" come from the idea that the monad IO is "impure" (which does not seem to be the case, does it?) or is it more of a mathematical concept of pure values vs values whose types are functors/applicatives/monads? or is it a way to say "simplest way to wrap the value, purest (least "modified") equivalent of the value as wrapped value"? 2017-07-01 15:09 GMT+02:00 Silent Leaf :

hi,

i just wanted to know, if i use pure instead of return, if there's any single risk of getting a different implementation of the function, or anything of that kind. also, am i right to assume that GHC will do what is needed so there's no actual redirection in the compiled code, in the case pure is defined in terms of return?

thanks