Re: [Haskell-beginners] interface/abstract class: what is the haskell way?

...

Here there is an "interface", the record of functions. But each module must basically define a function returning that record. Sure, the module must implement that function, the same as you must implement it in OO languages, but each module can also make up its mind for the name of the function.

You could also name the classes implementing the interface in any way, but will probably choose telling und helpful names.

Right, in an OO language i name the subclass, here the function. I was thinking the way i was because i import those modules qualified so the module name already gives me a description. Thank you! Emmanuel