I feel like you are close to a something, but the recursion makes it
difficult. You need to think about what types you've given and what you
need. The types of Send, Recv and Close make sense to me. Send takes a
chan and a bytestring and returns bool. Recv takes a chan and returns a
bytestring, close takes a chan and returns nothing. Accept takes a chan,
and something? and returns a chan?
I feel like if you can figure out what you actually want Accept to do, it
will become clearer. Here's my attempt. Accept takes a chan, takes a
procedure to loop on, a procedure to accept on, and then returns the server
chan to continue the loop. I don't know if this is entirely right, but it
type checks and hopefully it will give you some ideas.
{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude, DeriveFunctor, OverloadedStrings #-}
module Lib where
import Protolude
import Control.Monad.Free
import System.Socket
import System.Socket.Family.Inet
import System.Socket.Type.Stream
import System.Socket.Protocol.TCP
import Control.Exception ( bracket, catch )
import Data.ByteString as BS (uncons)
data NetworkActivity chan next =
Accept
chan
(Free (NetworkActivity chan) chan)
(chan -> Free (NetworkActivity chan) Text)
(chan -> next)
| Send chan ByteString (Bool -> next)
| Recv chan (ByteString -> next)
| Close chan (() -> next)
| Forked chan deriving Functor
recv :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) ByteString
recv chan = liftF (Recv chan identity)
sendit :: a -> ByteString -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Bool
sendit chan pl = liftF (Send chan pl identity)
clse :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Text
clse chan = liftF (Close chan (const "Quit"))
acc :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) a -> (a -> Free (NetworkActivity a)
Text) -> Free (NetworkActivity a) a
acc chan srv acc = liftF (Accept chan srv acc identity)
mchatterServer :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) a
mchatterServer chan = acc chan (mchatterServer chan) mchatterLoop
mchatterLoop :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Text
mchatterLoop chan = do
str <- recv chan
case BS.uncons str of
Nothing -> do
msg <- clse chan
Pure msg
Just x -> if str == "Bye" then
clse chan
else do
_ <- sendit chan str
mchatterLoop chan
interpretStdIO :: Free (NetworkActivity ()) r -> IO r
interpretStdIO prg = case prg of
Free (Accept sock _ _ g) -> interpretStdIO (g sock)
Free (Recv _ g) -> do
ln <- getLine
interpretStdIO (g (encodeUtf8 ln))
Free (Close _ r) -> do
putStrLn ("Server bye!" :: Text)
interpretStdIO (r ())
Pure r -> return r
Free (Send _ pl f) -> do
putStrLn (decodeUtf8 pl)
interpretStdIO (f True)
type TCPSocket = Socket Inet Stream TCP
tcpSock :: IO TCPSocket
tcpSock = do
s <- socket :: IO (Socket Inet Stream TCP)
setSocketOption s (ReuseAddress True)
bind s (SocketAddressInet inetAny 5000)
listen s 5
return s
interpretTCP :: Free (NetworkActivity TCPSocket) r -> IO r
interpretTCP prg = case prg of
Free (Accept serverSock svrLoop acceptProc g) -> bracket (return
serverSock)
(\s-> interpretTCP (clse s))
(\s-> do
(ss, sa) <- accept s
forkIO $ do
_ <- interpretTCP (acceptProc ss)
return ()
interpretTCP (g s)
)
Free (Recv sock g) -> do
bs <- receive sock 4096 mempty
putStrLn (decodeUtf8 bs)
interpretTCP (g bs)
Free (Close sock g) -> do
close sock
putStrLn ("Server bye!" :: Text)
interpretTCP (g ())
Pure r -> return r
Free (Send sock pl g) -> do
sent <- send sock pl mempty
interpretTCP (g (sent > 0))
I feel like it should be able to be written without Free in the
NetworkActivity datatype, but it will require some pattern matching on Free
and maybe some liftF's that I couldn't quite figure out.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Sumit Raja
Hello,
I am trying to get my head around free monads by developing a simple network abstraction DSL. I've made good progress before adding TCP/IP semantics of accepting connections. I'm now stuck with the creation of monadic functions.
I've defined the following:
data NetworkActivity chan next = Accept chan next (chan -> next) | Send chan ByteString (Bool -> next) | Recv chan (ByteString -> next) | Close chan (() -> next)
clse :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Text clse chan = liftF (Close chan (const "Quit"))
chatterServer :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Text chatterServer svrchan = Free $ Accept svrchan (chatterServer svrchan) chatterLoop
chatterLoop :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Text chatterLoop chan = Free $ Recv chan $ \bs -> case BS.uncons bs of Nothing -> clse chan Just x -> if bs == "Bye" then Free $ Close chan (\_ -> Pure "Quit") else Free (Send chan bs (\_ -> chatterLoop chan))
This works fine with the interpretTCP interpreter below accepting multiple connections:
interpretTCP :: Free (NetworkActivity TCPSocket) r -> IO r interpretTCP prg = case prg of Free (Accept serverSock svrLoop acceptProc) -> bracket (return serverSock) (\s-> interpretTCP (clse s)) (\s-> do (ss, sa) <- accept s forkIO $ do _ <- interpretTCP (acceptProc ss) return () interpretTCP svrLoop ) Free (Recv sock g) -> do bs <- receive sock 4096 mempty putStrLn (decodeUtf8 bs) interpretTCP (g bs) Free (Close sock g) -> do close sock putStrLn ("Server bye!" :: Text) interpretTCP (g ()) Pure r -> return r Free (Send sock pl g) -> do sent <- send sock pl mempty interpretTCP (g (sent > 0))
Where I'm stuck is defining the monadic version of accept and I'm beginning to think my original data type defined above may be wrong. As an initial step I've defined the following:
recv :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) ByteString recv chan = liftF (Recv chan identity)
sendit :: a -> ByteString -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Bool sendit chan pl = liftF (Send chan pl identity)
mchatterServer :: a -> Free (NetworkActivity a) Text mchatterServer chan = Free $ Accept chan (mchatterServer chan) (\s -> return (identity s) >>= mchatterLoop)
mchatterServer works as is, the interpreter accepts multiple connections. Similarly all good with recv and sendit. I am struggling with converting the Accept in mchatterServer into a function to use in the do syntax. The signature I think I should be using is
acc :: a -> NetworkActivity a Text -> Free (NetworkActivity a) (NetworkActivity a Text)
What I can't figure out is why it can't follow the pattern of recv and sendit above:
acc chan next = liftF $ Accept chan next identity
Which results in error on identity (using Protolude):
Expected type: a -> NetworkActivity a Text Actual type: NetworkActivity a Text -> NetworkActivity a Text
I can't really see how to get the types to line up and have now can't see through the type fog. What am I missing in my reasoning about the types?
Help much appreciated!
Thanks
Sumit _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners