Re: [Haskell-beginners] Amanda

As far as I know Amanda is closed source as well. From the Miranda Wikipedia page I found this link to Amanda (where you can download it) http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/teaching/3C11/amanda.html Thanks for the link. Will definitely read it. Op 30-12-2011 1:08, Peter Hall schreef:

From what gather, Amanda is a clone of Miranda - presumably created because Miranda is a closed-source product. Haskell draws heavily from Miranda, and some smaller programs can look almost indistinguishable in the two languages.

That said, Miranda/Amanda really aren't as sophisticated as Haskell, lacking type classes in particular.

Here is a paper comparing Haskell with Miranda: http://www.cs.mun.ca/~donald/techreports/2000-02-cmp_haskell_miranda.ps It's a little bit outdated but covers the main differences pretty well.

Peter

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Christiaan Kras wrote:

...

Hello list,

First time I'm posting here. I've been interested in Haskell for about a year now, but sadly haven't done too much with it yet.

I decided to get my bachelors degree in Computer Science/Engineering (it's a bit of a mixed course at my university) after having worked for over 4.5 years. One of the classes I've got to follow is discrete math.

A first glimpse on the study material made me think "Cool! They're using Haskell!". This is however not the case. Instead, we're using Amanda.

Amanda was written by Dick Bruin, who as far as I know used to teach at my university, but has now moved on to another university. I was told Amanda was being used at my university, NHL Leeuwarden (Netherlands) and the University of Twente (Netherlands). (strictly my university isn't a university, but high school means something different in English than it does in Dutch :-))

The reason I'm posting here is because Amanda seems extremely heavily influenced by Haskell. I think it was written in either Delphi or Pascal, but I've got to verify that with one of the teachers.

It's quite old as well, as it was developed between 1990 and 2000.

A lot of stuff written in Amanda can easily be converted to Haskell with a few small changes. Which makes me wonder why they aren't using Haskell now. List comprehensions use the same syntax, but use a semicolon instead of a comma for separating generators and terms. Operators such as +,/,* etc. are functions, just like they are in Haskell. For what I can tell Amanda is more or less a stripped down version of Haskell.

The thing I was wondering though, is if anyone on this list has ever heard of Amanda before. If so, where did you got in contact with it?

-- Christiaan Kras http://blog.htbaa.com

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

-- Christiaan Kras http://blog.htbaa.com