Thanks! That's exactly what I was hoping. --Patrick On 4/13/17 1:41 AM, Rahul Muttineni wrote:

Hi Patrick,

Yes, this will optimise to "a nice balanced tree of decisions with dense jump tables in the leafs" [1]. You can check out the comments in [1] for more details.

[1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/cmm/CmmSwitch.hs#L37

Hope that helps, Rahul

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Patrick Pelletier mailto:code@funwithsoftware.org> wrote:

Suppose I am doing a pattern match on a large number of consecutive (or mostly-consecutive) integers:

foo 0 = something foo 1 = somethingElse ... foo 1000 = anotherThing

Will GHC optimize this to a table lookup, or is it going to test each integer in turn? Am I better off using a Vector or Map instead of pattern matching?

Thanks,

--Patrick

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org mailto:Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners

-- Rahul Muttineni

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners