Hello everybody,

A small question. ----- packageP = do literal “package" -----

what is the "literal" in this code? My problem is

$ ghc ParserTest.hs [1 of 1] Compiling ParserTest ( ParserTest.hs, ParserTest.o )

ParserTest.hs:11:5: Not in scope: ‘literal’

$ ghc --version The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 7.10.3

Is this because I use old version of software?

Thanks, Andrey

2017-04-14 21:58 GMT+03:00 :

...

Send Beginners mailing list submissions to beginners@haskell.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners

Haskell-Beginners Info Page http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners mail.haskell.org Haskell-Beginners -- The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of

...

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to beginners-request@haskell.org

You can reach the person managing the list at beginners-owner@haskell.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Beginners digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Parsing (mike h) 2. Re: Parsing (David McBride) 3. Re: Parsing (Francesco Ariis) 4. Re: Parsing (mike h) 5. Re: Parsing (mike h)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:02:37 +0100 From: mike h To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell Subject: [Haskell-beginners] Parsing Message-ID: <2C66C9DC-30AF-41C5-B9AF-0D1DA19E0A2C@yahoo.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I have data PackageDec = Pkg String deriving Show

and a parser for it

packageP :: Parser PackageDec packageP = do literal “package" x <- identifier xs <- many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) return $ Pkg . concat $ (x:xs)

so I’m parsing for this sort of string “package some.sort.of.name”

and I’m trying to rewrite the packageP parser in applicative style. As a not quite correct start I have

packageP' :: Parser PackageDec packageP' = literal "package" >> Pkg . concat <$> many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier)

but I can’t see how to get the ‘first’ identifier into this sequence - i.e. the bit that corresponds to x <- identifier in the monadic version.

in ghci λ-> :t many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) :: Parser [[Char]]

so I think that somehow I need to get the ‘first’ identifier into a list just after Pkg . concat so that the whole list gets flattened and everybody is happy!

Any help appreciated.

Thanks Mike

------------------------------

Message: 2 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:17:42 -0400 From: David McBride To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Parsing Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Try breaking it up into pieces. There a literal "package" which is dropped. There is a first identifier, then there are the rest of the identifiers (a list), then those two things are combined somehow (with :).

literal "package" *> (:) <$> identifier <*> restOfIdentifiers where restOfIdentifiers :: Applicative f => f [String] restOfIdentifiers = many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier

I have not tested this code, but it should be close to what you are looking for.

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:02 PM, mike h wrote:

...

I have data PackageDec = Pkg String deriving Show

and a parser for it

packageP :: Parser PackageDec packageP = do literal “package" x <- identifier xs <- many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) return $ Pkg . concat $ (x:xs)

so I’m parsing for this sort of string “package some.sort.of.name”

and I’m trying to rewrite the packageP parser in applicative style. As a not quite correct start I have

packageP' :: Parser PackageDec packageP' = literal "package" >> Pkg . concat <$> many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier)

but I can’t see how to get the ‘first’ identifier into this sequence - i.e. the bit that corresponds to x <- identifier in the monadic version.

in ghci λ-> :t many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) :: Parser [[Char]]

so I think that somehow I need to get the ‘first’ identifier into a

...

...

just after Pkg . concat so that the whole list gets flattened and everybody is happy!

Any help appreciated.

Thanks Mike

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners Haskell-Beginners Info Page http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners mail.haskell.org Haskell-Beginners -- The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of

I've had good luck recently with Atom and Visual Studio code on Windows 10 and MacOS. I'm looking at the Haskell-ghc-mod, ide-Haskell and language-Haskell community packages right now on Atom, and on VS Code I've got Haskell ghc-mod, Haskell syntax highlighting and Haskell linter. I hope this helps. Also, do please trim stuff from previous posts not relevant to your question. I can't do it to this reply because I'm on a phone at the moment, and deleting that much stuff is more trouble than it's worth. Cheers Mike On 19 Apr 2017 10:17 am, "Frank Lugala" wrote: Can anyone suggest a good Haskell IDE for windows? ------------------------------ *From:* Beginners on behalf of David McBride *Sent:* Tuesday, April 18, 2017 4:22 PM *To:* The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell *Subject:* Re: [Haskell-beginners] Beginners Digest, Vol 106, Issue 7 That depends on what package you are using to parse. If you are using parsec, you can use the string function from Text.Parsec.Char. If you are using some other package, it probably has a different name for it. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Andrey Klaus wrote: primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell About Haskell-Beginners list primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell About Haskell-Beginners

...

------------------------------

Message: 3 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:35:32 +0200 From: Francesco Ariis To: beginners@haskell.org Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Parsing Message-ID: <20170414183532.GA4376@casa.casa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:02:37PM +0100, mike h wrote:

...

I have data PackageDec = Pkg String deriving Show

and a parser for it

packageP :: Parser PackageDec packageP = do literal “package" x <- identifier xs <- many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) return $ Pkg . concat $ (x:xs)

so I’m parsing for this sort of string “package some.sort.of.name”

and I’m trying to rewrite the packageP parser in applicative style. As

a

...

...

not quite correct start I have

Hello Mike,

I am not really sure what you are doing here? You are parsing a dot separated list (like.this.one) but at the end you are concatenating all together, why? Are you sure you are not wanting [String] instead of String?

If so, Parsec comes with some handy parser combinators [1], maybe one of them could fit your bill:

-- should work packageP = literal "package" *> Pkg <$> sepEndBy1 identifier (char '.')

[1] https://hackage.haskell.org/package/parsec-3.1.11/docs/Text- Parsec-Combinator.html

------------------------------

Message: 4 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:12:14 +0100 From: mike h To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Parsing Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi David,

Thanks but I tried something like that before I posted. I’ll try again maybe I mistyped.

Mike

...

On 14 Apr 2017, at 19:17, David McBride wrote:

Try breaking it up into pieces. There a literal "package" which is dropped. There is a first identifier, then there are the rest of the identifiers (a list), then those two things are combined somehow (with :).

literal "package" *> (:) <$> identifier <*> restOfIdentifiers where restOfIdentifiers :: Applicative f => f [String] restOfIdentifiers = many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier

I have not tested this code, but it should be close to what you are looking for.

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:02 PM, mike h wrote:

...

I have data PackageDec = Pkg String deriving Show

and a parser for it

packageP :: Parser PackageDec packageP = do literal “package" x <- identifier xs <- many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) return $ Pkg . concat $ (x:xs)

so I’m parsing for this sort of string “package some.sort.of.name”

and I’m trying to rewrite the packageP parser in applicative style. As a not quite correct start I have

packageP' :: Parser PackageDec packageP' = literal "package" >> Pkg . concat <$> many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier)

but I can’t see how to get the ‘first’ identifier into this sequence - i.e. the bit that corresponds to x <- identifier in the monadic version.

in ghci λ-> :t many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) :: Parser [[Char]]

so I think that somehow I need to get the ‘first’ identifier into a list just after Pkg . concat so that the whole list gets flattened and everybody is happy!

Any help appreciated.

Thanks Mike

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners

---

Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners

------------------------------

Message: 5 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:19:40 +0100 From: mike h To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily beginner-level topics related to Haskell Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Parsing Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Francesco, Yes, I think you are right with "Are you sure you are not wanting [String] instead of String?”

I could use Parsec but I’m building up a parser library from first principles i.e.

newtype Parser a = P (String -> [(a,String)])

parse :: Parser a -> String -> [(a,String)] parse (P p) = p

and so on….

It’s just an exercise to see how far I can get. And its good fun. So maybe I need add another combinator or to what I already have.

Thanks

Mike

...

On 14 Apr 2017, at 19:35, Francesco Ariis wrote:

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:02:37PM +0100, mike h wrote:

...

I have data PackageDec = Pkg String deriving Show

and a parser for it

packageP :: Parser PackageDec packageP = do literal “package" x <- identifier xs <- many ((:) <$> char '.' <*> identifier) return $ Pkg . concat $ (x:xs)

so I’m parsing for this sort of string “package some.sort.of.name”

and I’m trying to rewrite the packageP parser in applicative style. As a not quite correct start I have

Hello Mike,

I am not really sure what you are doing here? You are parsing a dot separated list (like.this.one) but at the end you are concatenating all together, why? Are you sure you are not wanting [String] instead of String?

If so, Parsec comes with some handy parser combinators [1], maybe one of them could fit your bill:

-- should work packageP = literal "package" *> Pkg <$> sepEndBy1 identifier (char '.')

[1] https://hackage.haskell.org/package/parsec-3.1.11/docs/Text- Parsec-Combinator.html <https://hackage.haskell.org/package/parsec-3.1.11/docs/Text -Parsec-Combinator.html> _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners