I don't think this question is off-topic but you will probably get more feedback on Haskell Cafe. As a matter of fact there is a discussion regarding the PVP ongoing now: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/haskell-cafe/X2-X3ohWAgI Hope that helps, -Christopher On Mon, Dec 15 2014, Zach Moazeni wrote:

Oh! I sent this to the Beginner list because it feels Beginner-ish (at least to me, who might be missing something obvious). But if this is more appropriate for Cafe, someone please let me know and I'll email that list instead.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Zach Moazeni wrote:

...

Hello,

Forgive me if this is a frequently asked question, I've searched the web and can't find an answer.

What is the history that led up to the PVP https://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy specifying two values as the major version?

I come from other tools that primarily use http://semver.org/ (or a variant) and I'm confused in what cases I should bump "A" but not "B" (or bump "B" but not "A")?

A concrete example: If I make backwards incompatible changes to a package whose latest version is 1.0.x, should the next version be 2.0.x or 1.1.x? What sorts of things should I consider for choosing 2.0 over 1.1 and vice versa?

Another question, by far most packages I have encountered either lead with a 0 or a 1 for "A". Does that have some bearing on the long term stability that package users should expect in the future?

Finally, if "1.0.x.." is meant to convey a level of long term support, does "B" get rarely used? Since "C" version bumps to include backwards compatible additions, and "D"+ for backwards compatible bug fixes. (I know "D" isn't technically a PVP category, I'm just relating it to the patch version of semver).

Thanks for your help! -Zach

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

-- Christopher Reichert irc: creichert gpg: C81D 18C8 862A 3618 1376 FFA5 6BFC A992 9955 929B