On 08/06/2011 11:37 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Christopher Howard wrote:

...

I'm learning to comment my code for haddock. However, haddock seems to be ignoring my documentation comments for instance implementations. Instead, it just uses the default explanation given in the original class definition. Does this require some kind of special syntax?

Can you give an example of what you are doing which doesn't do what you expect? I've had no trouble with this using Haddock 2.9.2.

Antoine

...

-- frigidcode.com theologia.indicium.us

_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

Sorry, a mistake in my syntax. I was under the impression that instance functions had to be explicitly exported in a module declaration. In other words, individual instance functions aren't supposed to be listed by the generated documentation anyway, just the fact that the new type is an instance of said class. -- frigidcode.com theologia.indicium.us