Re: [Haskell-beginners] Can fields in a record be optional?

I would expect I would run into trouble with this approach - when a function
receives one of these records as an argument, how does it know if it is safe
to acces the record fields in question?
I would prefer using Maybe types, different types altogether for summed
contracts, or imaking a Contract a type with two cases (as suggested
earlier).
On Jul 17, 2011 5:19 PM, "David Place"

Yes, I agree with you. In trying to attend to one thing at a time, I copied the use of "undefined" from the original poster's code. Certainly, it makes it easier to debug code if you can have a Show instance that doesn't throw an error! ____________________ David Place Owner, Panpipes Ho! LLC http://panpipesho.com d@vidplace.com On Jul 20, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Antoine Latter wrote:
I would expect I would run into trouble with this approach - when a function receives one of these records as an argument, how does it know if it is safe to acces the record fields in question?
I would prefer using Maybe types, different types altogether for summed contracts, or imaking a Contract a type with two cases (as suggested earlier).
participants (2)
-
Antoine Latter
-
David Place