Oh, right. That was a wrong copy'n'paste. Sorry. I'm of course
working on that "take n" proposal. The wiki page is ATM work in
progress. I'll put a formal grammar up until the end of the week. In
any case though, I guess the syntax is not the most important part,
though having common agreement would be best, of course.
Thomas
On 5/28/07, Duncan Coutts
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 02:22 +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote:
.. and as you probably all know, I am going to implement cabal-configurations. (And for those who didn't know--SoC stands for Summer of Code and Google pays me for fixing your problems!) My mentor is Isaac Jones, aka. SyntaxNinja.
I'll be working based on this e-mail http://www.mail-archive.com/cabal-devel@haskell.org/msg00195.html, as this is the one linked from the bug tracker.
The one you really want is the one you've got linked from the CabalConfigurations wiki page, ie
http://www.mail-archive.com/cabal-devel@haskell.org/msg00282.html
"Configurations proposal, take n" sent by Ian, summarising the proposal that we seemed to agree on.
Duncan
-- "Remember! Everytime you say 'Web 2.0' God kills a startup!" - userfriendly.org, Jul 31, 2006