On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:51 +0100, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
Sorry I haven't had a chance to review the test API yet, but I have a good excuse - I was getting ready for my marriage yesterday :-)
Perhaps the best excuse I've ever heard :-). Congratulations!
I'll see if I can do a review of the "detailed" interface this week.
This week?! Don't you have better things to do? But yes, a review at some point would be appreciated. The goal is to have something close to what test-framework has always had (ie tree of tests, QC, HUnit, other tests to be lifted in) but using as few language extensions as we can get away with. I also rather like Thomas' pure/impure distinction. It's also important of course to handle things like RNG seeds so that we can reproduce test runs. Duncan