Re: A-posteriori .cabal updates don't help (much) with optimistic-upper-bounds (was: Gearing up for a cabal-install-1.16.0 release)

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Malcolm Wallace wrote:

If the scheme is going to work at all, it must update _every_ version of text-foo that could be affected.

Is that an unrealistic expectation?

It at least demands the process be automatable, but then perhaps that's already a good idea.