#828: Distribution.License datatype and comment weirdness ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: sli | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.10.1.0 Severity: minor | Keywords: Difficulty: unknown | Ghcversion: Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Comment(by AntoineLatter): Replying to [comment:1 AntoineLatter]:
I have understood "AllRightsReserved" to mean "no license is granted".
This would be useful for organizations hosting Cabalized projects internally.
Here is a wikipedia entry on the issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved I'm not sure what sort of replacement should be offered. Would a blank "License" field imply "no license is granted?" I guess it would be the responsibility of someone downloading the package to inspect it for a license. -- Ticket URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/828#comment:2 Hackage http://haskell.org/cabal/ Hackage: Cabal and related projects