9 Nov
2009
9 Nov
'09
10:04 a.m.
Hi
We're not trying to nail down every last nuance in the licenses (e.g. I don't think we need to be trying to distinguish GPL-2 from GPL-2+).
So how is a Cabal library author meant to explain their intent? I just want to go with whatever helps the distros package my tools (although I don't want to put explicit licensing in each source code file), and it's the distros who have been asking for clarification. Knowing that GPL-2 is coming is great, but if it's newer Cabal/GHC only I'll just leave it as a comment in the .cabal file, then move it over in a few years time. Thanks, Neil