Yeah, sorry, I am using both cabal and cabal-install HEAD both fetched from
darcs last night.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 19:26 -0600, Thomas Tuegel wrote: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Peebles Which seems odd, since there are 2 test cases (not 0 as the output
claims)
and one of them should definitely be failing (it has a False in it).
Am I doing something wrong? Duncan and I made the decision to turn off the detailed type in the
current release because it's not totally ready. You should get a
warning to that effect when you run 'cabal configure --enable-tests'
with a detailed-type test. Your tests are not actually passing;
they're not even running, but Cabal is failing to produce a useful
error message. This is at the top of my to-do list (though I realize
that may be little consolation for your wasted time now). I think Daniel is actually using Cabal HEAD which has the detailed-0.9
test type enabled. If one tries that test type with the release
Cabal-1.10 then one does indeed get a warning at configure time. The behaviour with Cabal-1.10 is: $ cabal configure --enable-tests
Resolving dependencies...
Configuring zlib-0.5.3.1...
Warning: 'detailed-0.9' is not a supported test suite version.
The known test suite types are: exitcode-stdio-1.0 $ cabal test
Running 1 test suites...
0 of 1 test suites (0 of 1 test cases) passed. Daniel can you check if you are indeed using Cabal HEAD or not? Duncan