Re: Remove Setup.hs, use Setup.lhs only

27 Nov 2006


      Lemmih  writes:
...
On 11/27/06, Henning Thielemann  wrote:
...
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote:
...
I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we
can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the
user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the
Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants.
What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls
  runhaskell Setup.hs
 ?
Isn't that essentially what 'cabal-setup' is doing now?
cabal-setup is doing that and more, yes.

peace,

  isaac